Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15011 (CHH)

RAMNATH MESHRAM v. THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1114/2019 · 2026-01-11

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:1674 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1114 of 2019 Ramnath Meshram S/o Late Mr. Nirbhay Ram Meshram Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Diyabati, Posty Darra, Tahsil Gurur, District - Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Education Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Public Education Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Education Officer Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh 4 - Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Gurur, District - Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sharad Mishra, P.L. (SB: HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY K. AGRAWAL) Order on Board 12/01/2026 1. The petitioner’s application for adjustment on the post of ‘Peon’ has been rejected by the Director, Directorate of Public Instructions, Raipur (C.G.) on the ground that he has been appointed by Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Durg on 27.01.1996 as an adhoc peon on temporary basis. 2. Be that as it may, the petitioner is allowed to make a representation before respondent No. 5 for redressal of his grievance within 4 four weeks from today and in turn, the concerned respondent authority shall decide the representation of the petitioner, as early as possible, preferably within a period of 10 weeks, in accordance with law. 3. It is made clear that this court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case. 4. With such observation, this writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE Saurabh