HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16359 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. After due deliberations at length, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed to dismiss the instant petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars and details of the case. 2. Shri Shresth Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 (State Bank of India) has no objection to the submission advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. As such, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. October 6, 2026 vinay Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Satish Chaturvedi (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Rohit Singh Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad