[2026:RJ-JP:3396] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 368/2026 Ramswaroop S/o Mangilal, O Village Piplya Akheraj Police Station Chhipabarod Dist. Baran Rajasthan (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Chhabara) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 369/2026 Lokesh S/o Ramdayal, R/o Village Piplya Akheraj Police Station Chhipabarod Dist. Baran Rajasthan (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Chhabara) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Bairwa (Present in Person), Mr. Pavan Kumar Meena (Present in Person) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP, Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP and Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asst. Govt. Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 24/01/2026 1. Mr. Kuldeep Bairwa s/o Ramswaroop and Mr. Pavan Kumar Meena b/o Lokesh are representing the accused-petitioners Ramswaroop and Lokesh respectively. Advocates are not [2026:RJ-JP:3396] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-368/2026] appearing today in the Court. Mr. Kuldeep Bairwa and Mr. Pavan Kumar Meena have submitted photocopy of their Aadhar Card. 2. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.401/2025, registered at Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran for the offences under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act. 3. It is contended by the son and brother of the accused- petitioners that the quantity of contraband article recovered from the possession of accused-petitioner- Lokesh is below commercial quantity. It is also contended that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the accused- petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications and submitted the factual report. The same is taken on record. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. Considering the fact that the quantity recovered from the possession of petitioner- Lokesh is below commercial quantity. The petitioner- Ramswaroop has alleged to have committed offence under Section 8/29 of NDPS Act. No recovery of any contraband article was effected from the petitioner- Ramswaroop. There are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:3396] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-368/2026] 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Ramswaroop S/o Mangilal and 2. Lokesh S/o Ramdayal, in connection with FIR No. 8/21/2025 registered at Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/93-94