Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010158162026
2026:GAU-AS:14143
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1754/2026 ROHAN ALI S/O- LATE IDRIS ALI, R/O- CHAWALKHUWA GHORBANDI CHUK, P.S.- DIBRUGARH, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. MD IMDAD,MD IMRAN,MD R ISLAM,MS F HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 23.09.2026 Heard Mr. S M Adullah P, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D P Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel appearing for the informant. Page No.# 2/3
2. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, praying for the grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused petitioner, namely, Rohan Ali, in connection with Dibrugarh Police Station Case No. 189/2025, under Sections 118(2)/189(2) of the BNS, 2023. 3. The informant, Reshma Begum, lodged an FIR on 21.05.2025, alleging, inter alia, that the petitioner, along with some others, had intercepted the husband of the informant while he was going on a morning walk and took him to the residence of the petitioner, where he was assaulted with dangerous weapons, causing grievous injuries to his head, hand and leg. However, the police arrived and rescued the husband of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a long history of enmity between the informant side and the petitioner side and that several other cases are pending between the parties. It is further submitted that the principal accused in the case was granted bail by this Court vide order dated 14.08.2026 in Bail Appln. 2127/2026. It is also submitted that, upon perusal of the CD and the injury report, this Court had noted that no grievous injury, as alleged, was indicated in the said injury report and that the injured had been discharged against medical advice. 5. The CD, as called for, has been received. Page No.# 3/3
6. Learned Addl. Public Prosecutor submits that, after being discharged, the injured was taken to a private hospital in Guwahati; however, no further injury report is available. 7. Upon perusal of the initial injury report, this Court finds that the same does not indicate any grievous injury.
Having regard to the above, as well as the nature of the allegations, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. 8. Accordingly, in the event of his arrest, in connection with the aforesaid case, the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. 9. It is further directed that the petitioner shall appear before the I.O. within a period of 10 (ten) days from today. 10. The petition stands disposed of as allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant