HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9049 of 2026 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed today, notices need not be issued to the private-respondents. 3. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition inter-alia with the prayer to direct the Respondent No.2 i.e., Commissioner, Prayagraj Mandal, Prayagraj to decide the Revision No.824 of 2022 (Mohammad Jilani and others vs. Rasheeda Khatoon and others), District Kaushambi, within stipulated period. 4. Heard counsel for the parties. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the Respondent No.2 i.e., Commissioner, Prayagraj Mandal, Prayagraj, to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order, unless there is no legal impediment. March 18, 2026 Swati Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Laxmi Shankar, Shakeel Ahmad Azmi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prakash Padia,J.) Mohammad Jilani And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad