Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14998 (RAJ)

NIKITA D/O MAHAVEER KUMAR GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/12/2026 · 2026-01-09

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:914] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 12/2026 Nikita D/o Mahaveer Kumar Gurjar, Resedent of Village Bisalu, Post- Lekari, Tehasil Bansur, District Alwar (Kotputali -Behror) Raj, At present Ramsingh Ki Thani, Jairoli , Alwar Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The SHO, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputali-Behror, Rajasthan. 3. The Superintendent of Police, District Kotputali-Behror, Rajasthan. 4. Mahaveer Kumar Gurjar, Resedent of Village Bisalu, Post- Lekari, Tehasil Bansur, District Kotputali -Behror Raj, ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Gaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 09/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioner is major and present in person. She has duly been identified by her counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioner seeking protection from the private respondent as she is apprehending danger to her life and liberty at the hands of private respondent. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is major and she is mature enough to take decision of her life. It is [2026:RJ-JP:914] (2 of 2) [CRLW-12/2026] submitted that the petitioner is living in a live-in-relationship with one Krishan son of Sh. Pappu and in this regard, an agreement dated 02.01.2026 has also been executed between them, which has been annexed with this petition. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is receiving continuous threats from the private respondent, so she prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioner is directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.2- Station House Officer, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputali-Behror (Raj.) and respondent No.2 is directed to provide protection to the petitioner, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioner. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /331