AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD. v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPC/6547/2025 · 2026-01-11
Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14995 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14995 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:1634
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6547 of 2025 • Au Small Finance Bank Ltd. Registered Office 19/a. Dhuleshwar Garden Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan Branch Office- 3rd Floor, Sky Plaza, Gaurav Path, Near Banthia Hospital Raja Talab, Raipur Chhattisgarh, Through Its Manager Dheeraj Pandey Son Of Vivekanand Pandey Aged About 44 Years, Branch Officer -3rd Floor Sky Plaza, Gaurav Path Near Banthia Hospital Raja Talab, Raipur Chhattisgarh,
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya Naya Raipur (C.G.)
2. Collector Durg District- Durg (C.G.)
3. Sub Divisional Officer (Rev) Durg District- Durg Chhattisgarh
4. Additional Tahsildar Tahsil Durg District- Durg Chhattisgarh,
5. Station House Officer Police Station Sirsa District- Durg Chhattisgarh,
6. Manish Kumar Yadav S/o Shiv Shankar Yadav R/o House No.68, Ward No.5 Bhatgaon Tahsil And District- Durg Chhattisgarh,
7. Smt. Bharti Bai Yadav W/o Manish Kumar Yadav R/o House No.68, Ward No.5 Bhatgaon Tahsil And District- Durg Chhattisgarh,
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Dewangan, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State. : Mr. Vivek Verma, Govt. Advocate.
(Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board
2 12/01/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to consider the complaint made by him and to evict/dispossess/remove the encroachers respondents No. 6 & 7 from mortgaged property of the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in pursuance of the proceeding initiated under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the Tahsildar has already handed over possession to the petitioner on 2-9-2025, but subsequently respondents No. 6 & 7 have forcibly broken the door of the house and entered into the premises. He would further submit that they have already made a complaint against the respondents No. 6 & 7 before the concerned Police Station, but no action has been taken against them.
3. Since the alternate and efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner, let the petitioner take alternate remedy available to him under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
4. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition is disposed of.
5. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
JUDGE Raju
RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2026.01.13 11:07:20 +0530