Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010201802026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2794/2026 NAJRUL ISLAM ALIAS NAZRUL ISLAM S/O FAYAZ ALI, R/O PACHIM SAMARALI, P/S MURAJHAR, DISTRICT HOJAI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SURAJIT DAS, Mr I H CHOWDHURY,JANIFAR RAHMAN,MR. I U CHOWDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 23.09.2026 Heard Mr. S. Das, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Murajhar PS Case No. 168/2026, registered under Sections 112(2), 3(5), 3(6), Page No.# 2/3 3(8), 308(6), 308(7), 317(4), 318(4), 313(2), 351(2), 351(3), 61(2) of the BNS, 2023. 3. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner was arrested and put behind the bars since 05.09.2026 was lodged by the police personnel of Murajhar Police Station, stating, inter alia, that the petitioner, along with others, had, without any authority or professional qualification of any kind, stationed themselves in and around the premises of the police station and were making a livelihood by soliciting money from persons who came to the police station in connection with their official work. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the name of the petitioner figured at in the FIR, but no specific allegation has been made against him and that the FIR only contains vague allegation about cheating the public and taking money from them along with other action. 5. Mr. B. Sarma, the learned APP for the State, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner, along with others, used to stay in and around the police station and intercept persons who came there and extract money from them, as could be seen from the FIR. 6. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsels, more so in view of the fact that, no specific allegation is made against the petitioner, neither any statement with regard to someone being victimized by the action of the petitioner, this court deems it fit to enlarge the petitioner on bail on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with one local surety of the like amount of the satisfaction of the CJM, Hojai under Page No.# 3/3 the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall positively appear before the Investigating Officer as and when call for. (ii) The petitioner shall not hamper and tamper with the evidence of the case, and/or influence the witness connected with the case; and (iii) The petitioner shall not leave their residence without prior permission of the Investigating Officer. 7. The Bail Applications stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant