1 2026:CGHC:1609 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 222 of 2026 1 - Dr. Sneh Lata Das W/o - Dr. Vinod Kumar Das Aged About 37 Years R/o - Ward No. 15, Mandi Road, Akaltara, District - Janjgir - Champa, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of State Animal Husbandry Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Directorate Of Veterinary Services, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Director Directorate Of Veterinary Services, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Co - Ordinator - Cum - Secretary State Level Co - Ordination Committee (Transfer Redressal Committee), General Administration Department, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Dr. Nidhi Vanjari (Tenbhurkar) Poultry Farming, Circle Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Anup Mazumdar, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, P.L. SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 12/01/2026 1. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for petitioner submits that according to the information of petitioner, post of Assistant Veterinary Assistant Surgeon is vacant at Animal Welfare Board, Raipur, Veterinary Council, Raipur and Dog Shelter Home, Raipur, Labhandi Raipur. He contended that petitioner will submit fresh representation, BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 therefore, he is not pressing this petition on merits and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to submit fresh representation raising all the grounds as raised in this petition at Para 9.8. He however, submits that as one of child of petitioner is studying in Class- 5th and exams are to be conducted shortly, therefore, till the representation is decided observation be made that no coercive steps shall be taken against petitioner. 2. On due consideration on the submission of learned counsel for petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to petitioner to submit fresh representation in view of the grounds as pleaded in para-9.8 of the writ petition and if such representation is submitted, concerned authorities shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of three weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 3. Till the decision of representation and further considering that one of the child of petitioner was studying in Class - 5th , it is directed that no coercive steps shall be taken against petitioner. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram