Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14986 (JHR)

DILESHWAR GOPE v. STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS

WPC/5366/2011 · 2026-03-26

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8643 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5366 of 2011 ---- Dileshwar Gope son of late Jugu Gope, resident of Village Itki, Post Office Itki, Police Station Itki, District Ranchi, Jharkhand …… …. .... Petitioner(s) -- Versus -- 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Member, Board of Revenue, Government of Jharkhand, Post Office Dhurwa, Police Station -Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 3.The Additional Collector, Ranchi, Post Office G.P.O, Police Station -Kotwali, District Ranchi 4.The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sadar, Ranchi, Post Office G.P.O., Police Station Kotwali, District Ranchi 5.Lagnu Sao son of late Gaja Sao, resident of Village Itki, Post Office and Police Station Itki, District Ranchi, Jharkhand 6.Kunwar Keshri, son of late Gaja Sao, resident of Village Itki, Post Office and Police Station -Itki, District Ranchi, Jharkhand …… ….. .... Opp. Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ---- For the Petitioner(s) :- None For the State :- Mr. Shantanu Gupta, AC to AAG-III Mr. Sahbaj Aktar, AC to AAG-III For the Resp.No.5 :- Mr. Ashok Kumar Pandey, Advocate ---- 10/26.03.2026 On repeated calls, nobody has responded on behalf of the petitioner, however, learned counsels for the respondent State as well as respondent no.5 are present. 2. This writ petition was dismissed for non-compliance by the order dated 09.01.2012 which was further restored by order dated 05.03.2013. 3. on 08.02.2022, adjournment was taken on behalf of the petitioner. On 31.07.2025, further time was taken by the petitioner and on 12.01.2026 nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner, however, the learned counsel for the respondent no.5 was present. 4. Today, again, on repeated calls, nobody has responded on behalf of the petitioner. 5. It transpires that the petitioner has lost interest in the matter, and as such, this writ petition is dismissed. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated : 26th March, 2026 SI/