Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14985 (RAJ)

RAJKUMAR S/O SHRI SUMER SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/178/2026 · 2026-01-09

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:823] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 178/2026 Rajkumar S/o Shri Sumer Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dulawa, P.s. Buhana, District Jhunjhunu. Raj. (Presently The Accused Petitioner Confined In District Sub Jail, Khetari) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Mr. Rajesh Swami Mr. Amandeep For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 247/2025 registered at Police Station Buhana, District Jhunjhunu for offences u/S 19/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 4. Taking into consideration the allegations against the accused petitioner so also the fact that he is in custody since 15.12.2025 and after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the alleged offences are triable by First Class Magistrate, this Court, without expressing any opinion [2026:RJ-JP:823] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-178/2026] on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /226