VANDANA BHATIA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CRMMO/627/2026 · 2026-07-09
Sandeep Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14980 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14980 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MMO No.627 of 2026 Date of Decision: 09.07.2026 _______________________________________________________ Vandana Bhatia & others
….Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & another … Respondents _______________________________________________________
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioners : Mr. Yug Singhal & Mr. Hitender Verma,
Advocates.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent-State.
Mr. Shivam Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.2. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Learned counsel representing the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh, if required and desired. Ordered accordingly.
2.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge July 09, 2026 (shankar)
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?