Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1498 (JHR)

SAHIL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1300/2026 · 2026-03-23

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:8113 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1300 of 2026 ---- Sahil Kumar, aged 23 years, son of Suresh Kumar, resident of Paharpur, P.O.- Hansdih, P.S.- Giridih Muffasil, District- Giridih. .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, A.P.P. ---- 02/23.03.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No.400 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Section 318(2), 319, 338, 336(3),341 and 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is made of furnishing the incorrect Khatiyan and family tree, online for obtaining the caste certificate as well as the residential certificate. He further submits that the said certificate has not been utilized by the petitioner. However, residential address was found to be correct. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that only on the basis of incorrect khatiyan and family tree, the caste certificate was obtained. -2- 5. In view of the above and considering that the residential certificate was found to be correct in the report and in the said caste certificate has not been utilized as has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, in that view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. 6. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 23.03.2026 Jay/