Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14979 (KAR)

MR VISHEN VINAYA KUMAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/15325/2025 · 2026-02-17

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9562 CRL.P No. 15325 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 15325 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC)/ 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. MR. VISHEN VINAYA KUMAR S/O SRI. VINAYA KUMAR P.K., AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT NO.1086, APPUS DEN BROTHERS COLONY, BEHIND RAILWAY LINE, ASHOK THEATER, CHIKKABANAVARA, BENGALURU - 560090. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. VARSHITHA T.K., AND SRI. BASAVARAJ S. SAPPANAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BANNERGHATTA POLICE STATION, BANNERGHATTA - 560 083, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9562 CRL.P No. 15325 of 2025 2. SMT. DEESHMA G. D/O GOPALAKRISHNA K., W/O VISHEN VINAYAKUMAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/A NO. 47, NANDANAM PUTTARAJU LAYOUT, KALKERE VILLAGE, BANNERGATTA, BENGALURU - 560 083. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY MAHADEVAIAH, HCGP FOR R1; SMT. RASHMI GEORGE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) *************** THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.528 OF BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA - 2023 (FILED U/S.438 CR.P.C) PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.5001/2025 ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.119/2025 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 85 OF BNS 2023 ARRAYING THE PETITIONER AS ACCUSED WHICH IS PENDING BEFORE THE HON'BLE III ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANEKAL, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9562 CRL.P No. 15325 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a Memo dated 11.02.2026, seeking withdrawal of the Criminal Petition. The Memo so filed reads as follows: "In this, the Advocate for the petitioner begs to submit that albeit there are number of cases in between the petitioner and the respondent No. 2, the particulars of all said cases have not been narrated and the grounds buttressing for quashing are also not narrated in the present petition, which is nothing but due to technical defect. Hence, it is most humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition, in the interest of justice and equity." In terms of Memo, the Criminal Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Accordingly, I.A.1/2025 does not survive for consideration. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE sac List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13