Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14979 (CHH)

NANDLAL SARVEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

WPS/3123/2020 · 2026-01-11

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:1677 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3123 of 2020 Nandlal Sarvey S/o Shri Sakularam Sarvey, Aged About 62 Years R/o Ward No. 66, Arvind Marg, Sarkanda, Police Station - Sarkanda, Civil And Revenue District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Directorate - Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bilaspur District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - District Malaria Officer, Bilaspur District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Afroz Khan, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 12.01.2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has been granted retiral dues on 31.08.2020, but interest has not been paid to him and, for which, he may be permitted to file SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 a comprehensive representation alongwith supportive documents before the concerned respondent, which may be directed to be considered and decided within a reasonable time. 3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is permitted to file aforesaid representation alongwith copy of this order and supportive documents before the concerned respondents within 04 weeks’ from today and, in turn, the concerned respondents are directed to consider and decide petitioners’ said representation in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order preferably within 06 weeks from the date of receipt of said representation. 4. With aforesaid observation and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No cost. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if