Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14975 (PAT)

Vishal Kumar @ Fudan v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./35180/2026 · 2026-05-21

Ansul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35180 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-129 Year-2025 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Vishal Kumar @ Fudan Son of Sunil Rai, Resident of Village- Chiknauta, PS- Hajipur Town, Dist- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. (Dr.) Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL ORAL ORDER 2 21-05-2026 The matter was heard via video conferencing mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 129 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 4. As per prosecution case, while the informant was going towards a grocery shop, in the meantime, the petitioner along with one co-accused came riding on a motorcycle and fired gunshots on the informant, who somehow saved himself by taking shelter. The petitioner threatened the informant and fled away. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35180 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026 2/3 petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel lastly submits that petitioner has 11 criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 23.04.2025. 6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that no harm was caused to anybody and further considering petitioner’s period of custody, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail after framing of charge, if not framed as yet, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 129 of 2025. If the charge has already been framed, the petitioner shall be released forthwith. 9. It is made clear that any observation made herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35180 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026 3/3 adjudication of the present bail application. Such observation shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any manner. Shahnawaz/- (Ansul, J) U T