Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14974 (ALL)

RAJPATI YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/2141/2026 · 2026-10-08

Arun Bhansali, Kshitij Shailendra

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2141 of 2026 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the District Magistrate to get inquiry completed against the village Pradhan pursuant to order dated 24.05.2025 by invoking provisions of Section 95(1)(g) of the Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947. 2. Instructions were called, wherein it has been indicated that pursuant to the inquiry ordered on 24.05.2025, inquiry report was produced on 18.07.2025, however, as the inquiry report was not clear, fresh report was sought, which was submitted on 07.11.2025, wherein none of the allegations made against the Pradhan were found established and the said report has been accepted by the District Magistrate. 3. Copy of the instructions have been made available to the counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the above fact situation, wherein already the inquiry pursuant to the order dated 24.05.2025 has been concluded, no further orders are required to be passed. 5. The petition stands disposed of. October 9, 2026 M.Pal/Jyotsana Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devbratt Yadav, Ram Pratap Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.K. Goyal (A.C.S.C.) (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Rajpati Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and 5 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad