Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14973 (JHR)

AMAR SINGH ALIAS AMAR PARAS SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1219/2026 · 2026-03-26

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1219 of 2026 --------- Amar Singh @ Amar Paras Singh, aged about 33 years, son of Late Paras Singh, resident of near Match Factory Lane, Madan Jadhav Chawl, Shri Krishna Chowk, Kurla (West), P.O. and P.S. Kurla (West) District Mumbai, Maharashtra. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:-26.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Section 111(2) (b), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) & 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) & 84 (C) of the Information Technology Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner so as to establish his involvement in the alleged cybercrime. He further submits that there is no material evidence to show that the petitioner has committed any offence, and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He lastly submits that the co-accused has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.03.2026, passed in B.A. No. 1236 of 2026 and the petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Regard being head to the facts and circumstances of the case that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge- II- cum Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deohgar, in connection with Deoghar (Cyber), P.S. case No. 167 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 26.03.2026 Amardeep/- Uploaded 30.03.2026