[2026:RJ-JP:812] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 161/2026 Vikram Alias Vicky S/o Maniram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Dhani Jhaldawali Tan Papda Kalan, Police Station Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (Accused In Present Confined In Sub Jail District Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sain Mr. Vivek Kumar Meena Ms. Anjali Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P. Mr. Y.K. Sharma, for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 339/2025, registered with the Police Station, Udaipur Wati, District Jhunjhunu for offence punishable u/S 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 308(2), 307, 324(5) of B.N.S. 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary. 4. In the First Information Report, the accused-petitioner has not been named. The complainant has named three persons as regards the involvement in the incident as an accused. The accused-petitioner was arrested, however, no test identification parade has been conducted whether the petitioner was involved in [2026:RJ-JP:812] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-161/2026] the incident or not. The accused-petitioner is said to be in custody since 16.12.2025. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant was put a query whether accused-petitioner is known to the complainant or not, he answered that the accused-petitioner was not known to him. Since the accused is not named in the FIR and the complainant was not known to him, it was duty of the Investigating Officer to get conduct the test identification parade so as ascertain whether accused-petitioner was involved in the incident or not however, no test identification parade has been conducted. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly that fact that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2025, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner named above shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /215