[2026:RJ-JP:3926] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 85/2026 1. Hariom S/o Ramnarayan, R/o Bhanwata, P.S. Kolwa, District Dausa. 2. Vijendra S/o Ramnarayan Meena, R/o Bhanwata, P.S. Kolwa, District Dausa. 3. Ratan S/o Harikishan Meena, R/o Bhanwata, P.S. Kolwa, District Dausa. 4. Harimohan S/o Babulal Meena, R/o Bhanwata, P.S. Kolwa, District Dausa. 5. Bhagchand Meena S/o Ramjilal Meena, R/o Kalakho, P.S. Sikandra, District Dausa. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. 2. Ashok Kumar Meena S/o Babulal Meena, R/o Banepura, Tehsil Sikrai, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Chaman Singh HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/01/2026 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.179/2024 registered at Police Station Jawahar Circle, District Jaipur City (East) (Rajasthan) for offences punishable under Sections 143, 365, 308, 323 & 341 of IPC on the basis of compromise. 2. Petitioners and complainant are present in person and they have duly been identified by their counsel. [2026:RJ-JP:3926] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-85/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The affidavit in regard of compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this Criminal Misc. Petition is allowed and the FIR No.179/2024 registered at Police Station Jawahar Circle, District Jaipur City (East) (Rajasthan), is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /139