CRWP-4735 IN THE (162 ) NAINSEE SH STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o official respon petitioners at t representation 2. submitted tha 21.04.2026 be (Annexure P but the same thereon. He 4735-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH EE SHARMA AND ANOTHER Versus
OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Chirag Girdhar, Advocate for Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been file tion of India seeking issuance of a w respondents No.2 and 3 to protect rs at the hands of respondents No.4 tation dated 21.04.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned co d that the petitioners have recentl 26 before the Senior Superintendent re P-8) raising their grievances as me same has not yet been considered a He further submitted that at this sta NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH
CRWP-4735-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 23.04.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
ate for the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab en filed under Article 226/227 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the protect the life and liberty of the 4 to 5 and to take action on their ure P-8). ed counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on ndent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mohali as mentioned in the present petition ered and no action has been taken this stage, the petitioners would be ners
f the g the the their has on ohali tition aken AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-4735 satisfied if ap Superintenden representation 3. 4. notice on beha be done in du her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid repre within a perio accordance w petitioners, the order to protec
23.04.2026 Amit Sharma 4735-2026 (O&M) (2) if appropriate directions are issue tendent of Police, SAS Nagar, Mo tation filed by the petitioners and take Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senio n behalf of the respondents-State and in due course. Let a complete set of ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer ma ting anything on the merits of the of at this stage with a direction to r d representation dated 21.04.2026 (An period of 15 days from today, by nce with law. Needless to say, if rs, the official respondents would pro protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   issued to respondent No.2-Senior r, Mohali to decide the aforesaid d take necessary action thereon. Senior DAG, Punjab, has advance te and submits that the needful will set of the paperbook be supplied to yer made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is on to respondent No.2 to decide the 26 (Annexure P-8) of the petitioners y, by passing a speaking order in ay, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security in (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
ned:- Yes/No

enior esaid ance will ed to thout n is e the ners er in the ity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 19:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.