Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14958 (GAU)

ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. ABDUS SALAM AND ANR

I.A.(Civil)/2275/2026 · 2026-09-17

Mridul Kumar Kalita

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010136692026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2275/2026 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD (A CENTRAL GOVT. UNDERTAKING) HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI, G.S. ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI - 781 007 REPRESENTED BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER, GAUHATI REGIONAL OFFICE, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI- 781007 VERSUS ABDUS SALAM AND ANR S/O ISMAIL HUSSAIN, R/O VILLAGE - SARIATPUR, P.O. - SAUPUR, P.S. - KALGACHIA, DISTRICT - BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN -781319 2:SADDAM JAMADAR S/O SIDDIQUE JAMADAR R/O VILLAGE - GALIA P.O. - GALIA P.S. - HOWLY DISTRICT - BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 78135 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. R D MOZUMDAR, MR. S P SHARMA,MS. C MOZUMDAR Advocate for the Respondent : , In MFA Case No. 7840/2026 With MFA Case No. 7840/2026 Page No.# 2/3 (Filing Number) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 18.09.2026 [1] Heard Ms. R.D. Mozumdar, the learned counsel for the applicant. [2] On perusal of the Office Note dated 16.09.2026, it appears that notices issued to opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 have been duly served. [3] This interlocutory application has been preferred by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, praying for condonation of delay of 81 days in preferring the connected appeal, whereby the judgment and award dated 03.02.2026, passed by the learned Commissioner of Employee’s Compensation, Barpeta, in E.C. Case No. 280/2022, has been impugned. [4] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has stated the reasons for delay in paragraph Nos. 3 to 8 of the instant interlocutory application. [5] After going through the said grounds, this court is of the considered opinion that the grounds stated therein may be regarded as sufficient cause which prevented the applicant/insurance company in preferring the connected appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. [6] As such, the delay of 81 days in preferring the Page No.# 3/3 connected Miscellaneous First Appeal is hereby condoned and this interlocutory application is allowed. [7] The Registry shall register the connected Miscellaneous First Appeal and list the same for admission after a week, on a date to be fixed by the Registry. JUDGE Comparing Assistant