1 2026:CGHC:1150 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 126 of 2026 1. Toman Lal S/o Premlal Sahu Aged About 26 Years R/o Village- Bhothidih, Bodra, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Employment And Training, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Director Employment And Training, Directorate, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 3. Principal Government Industrial Training Institute, Nagri, Sihava, District- Dhamtari, C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate For Respondents : Ms. Akansha Verma Dabhadkar, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 08/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that on 1.10.2021 petitioner was appointed as Guest Lecturer in respondent No.3-Government Industrial Training Institute, Nagri Sihava, District Dhamtari, but on account of appointment of regular Lecturer on 23.9.2023, he was discontinued. However, after SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.01.08 18:21:54 +0530 2 getting knowledge that the post of Lecturer is lying vacant in respondent No.3, petitioner submitted representation dated 23.12.2025 before respondent No.3 for permitting him to work as Guest Lecturer, Subject- Business/ Welder. However, no decision on the representation submitted by petitioner is taken till date, therefore, he prays that a direction be issued to respondent No.3 to take decision on representation submitted by petitioner at the earliest within specified time. 2. Learned State Counsel submits that she is having no objection to limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, in particular limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide representation dated 23.12.2025 submitted by petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the claim of petitioner. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-