PUVADA BADIRI NARAYANA v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/11144/2026 · 2026-04-26
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1495 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1495 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010202362026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 11144/2026 Between:
1. PUVADA BADIRI NARAYANA, S/O. LATE PUVVADA VENKATA SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. 4-125, ANUMALLIPET, VETAPALEM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 523187.
2. PUVADA LAKSHMI KUMARI,, W/O. LATE PUVVADA RANGA RAO, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. 2-75, 2ND STREET, CHIMAKURTHI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 523226.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.-522237
2. THE ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.523001
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SHAIK ASIF Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
2
The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri Shaik Asif, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development and Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Ongole Municipal Corporation.
2. Sri S. Vijay Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Ongole Municipal Corporation, submits that the case involved in the present Writ Petition is covered by a Common
Order of this Court dated 24.02.2026 in W.P.No.5188 of 2026 & batch.
3. Sri Shaik Asif, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, would also confirm this position that the present case is covered by the above Common
Order.
4. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is allowed in terms of the Common Order passed by this Court dated 24.02.2026 in W.P.No.5188 of 2026 & batch. No order as to costs.
5. Registry is directed to attach a copy of the Common Order passed by this Court dated 24.02.2026 in W.P.No.5188 of 2026 & batch along with this
Order.
6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:27.04.2026 Vns