L.Vinoth v. The District Revenue Officer Cum Sub-Collector,
WP/13020/2026 · 2026-04-09
Abdul Quddhose
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14949 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14949 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.13020 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 09.04.2026
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE W.P.No.13020 of 2026 1.L.Vinoth 2.L.Baskaran 3.S.Madankumar ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer-Cum-Sub-Collector, Tiruvannamalai – 606 601, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Arani 632301, Tiruvannamalai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Officer, Polur – 606 803, Tiruvannamalai District. 4.The Zonal Deputy Thasildar, Taluk Officer, Polur – 606 803, Tiruvannamalai District. 5.Thenmozhi ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to conduct an enquiry and dispose the revision petition filed by the petitioners dated 10.01.2025 which is pending before the first respondent within a time frame stipulated by this Court. Page No.1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.13020 of 2026 For Petitioners : Mr.S.Anbazhagan For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate [R1 to R4] Notice dispensed with [R5] *****
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for a limited relief. The petitioners seek for an early disposal of the revision petition dated 10.01.2025, pending on the file of the 1st respondent.
2. Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. Since no adverse order is passed against the 5th respondent in this writ petition, notice to the 5th respondent is dispensed with by this Court.
3. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioners’ revision petition is directed to be disposed of by the 1st respondent on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court, by adhering to the principles of natural justice. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioners’ revision petition. Page No.2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.13020 of 2026
4. For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the petitioners’ revision petition, dated 10.01.2025 on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after hearing the objections of the 5th respondent and any other party, whom the 1st respondent deems it fit to enquire, and by adhering to the principles of natural justice. No costs. 09.04.2026 Index : Yes / No (2/2) Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No sp To 1.The District Revenue Officer-Cum-Sub-Collector, Tiruvannamalai – 606 601, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Arani 632301, Tiruvannamalai District. 3.The Tahsildar, Taluk Officer, Polur – 606 803, Tiruvannamalai District. 4.The Zonal Deputy Thasildar, Taluk Officer, Polur – 606 803, Tiruvannamalai District. Page No.3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.13020 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,
J.
sp W.P.No.
13020
of 202
6 09.04.2026 (2/2) Page No.4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.13020 of 2026 W.M.P.No.14269 of 2026 in W.P.No.13020 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE,
J.
Ordered on payment of separate court fee. 09.04.2026 sp (½) Page No.5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis