CRWP No.2517
IN TH 241 Deepshikha State of Ha CORAM: Present: SUMEET G 1. By w Constitution official resp respondent N 2. Notic 3. On th accepts noti 4. As pe wishes of members/re 5. Both upon their A Deepshikha 2517 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGAR ***** shikha and another v. Haryana and others AM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SU Mr. M.S. Rana, Advocate for th --- EET GOEL, J. (Oral) By way of present petition filed itution of India, petitioners are seekin al respondents to protect their life ndent Nos.4 to 6. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 On the asking of the Court, Mr. Gu ts notice on behalf of the official respo As per the petitioners, they have mar s of respondent Nos. 4 to 6, wh ers/relative of the petitioners. Both the petitioners have claimed th their Aadhar Cards indicating that da shikha is 7.5.2002 and petitioner No.2 -1-
UNJAB AND HARYANA AT IGARH CRWP No.2517 of 2026 Date of decision: 6.3.2026 Date of uploading : 7.3.2026 …......Petitioners …......Respondents CE SUMEET GOEL e for the petitioners filed under Article 226 of the seeking issuance of directions to the r life and liberty at the hands of s No.1 to 3. r. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana l respondents. e married on 10.12.2025 against the , who happen to be the family med themselves to be major relying that date of birth of petitioner No.1- No.2-Akshey Kumar is 10.2.2000.
2026 2026 2026 the o the s of yana st the mily lying - ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.03.07 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.2517
6. Witho also the me to direct res into the repr submitted b two weeks f 7. Keepi married aga respondent meeting of t their other parties may 8. Liber this order on 9. Howe other case, t taking lawfu 10. The p shall also sta 6.3.2026 Ashwanii 2517 of 2026 Without commenting on the legality he merits of contentions raised in the ect respondent No.2- Superintendent o he representation dated 2.3.2026 (Ann itted by the petitioners & pass approp eeks from today. Keeping in view the fact that both ed against the wishes of their family ndent No.2- Superintendent of Poli ng of the petitioners as well as the pare other concerned family members in s may endeavour to resolve their dispu Liberty is reserved in favour of privat rder on showing sufficient cause. However, if the petitioners are found case, then this order shall not preclude lawful action against the petitioners. The petition stands disposed of. P also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable: -2-
gality and validity of the marriage as in the petition, I deem it appropriate ndent of Police, Kurukshetra to look (Annexure P-5) stated to have been appropriate orders thereupon within both the petitioners claim to have family(s), I direct that if possible, f Police, Kurukshetra may call a he parents of both the petitioners and ers in his/her presence so that the r dispute(s) and live amicably. private respondents to seek recall of found to have been involved in any reclude the competent authority from ners. of. Pending application(s), if any, (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
ge as riate look been ithin have sible, all a s and t the all of any from any, ASHWANI KUMAR 2026.03.07 16:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document