[2026:RJ-JP:2433] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 112/2026 Govind @ Golu S/o Ashok @ Khanna, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Raigaro Ka Mohalla, Naya Shahar, Kishangarh, Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer (At Present Confined At Central Jail, (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Pandey For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 20/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 180/2025 registered at Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer for offences u/S 115(2), 126(2), 134, 189(2) of BNS. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the accused petitioner that as per the contents of the FIR as well as the statements of the injured witness, the injury which has been opined to be dangerous to life has not been specifically attributed to the accused petitioner. It is also submitted that there are general allegations against as many as 10-11 persons. The accused petitioner is said to be in custody for last more than one [2026:RJ-JP:2433] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-112/2026] month and he is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that in the alleged incident, the injured- Pukhraj has sustained three injuries, out of which two have been opined to be dangerous to life. 5. On scrutiny of the case diary, it is found that there are general allegations against as many as 10-11 persons of making attack to the injured-Pukhraj who has sustained three injuries. 6. In the contents of the FIR as well as the statements of the injured witness u/S 180 BNSS, the injury which has been opined to be dangerous to life has not been specifically attributed to the present accused petitioner. Hence, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) each, together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)(each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /162