[2026:RJ-JP:811] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 159/2026 Mohanlal S/o Jaiaram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Pattikalan Bamanwas Police Station Bamanwas District Sawai Madhopur, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined At Sub District Jail Gangapurcity). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Singodia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta,P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 286/2025, registered with the Police Station, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur for offence punishable u/S 318(4), 338, 340(2) of B.N.S. 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of selling out the khatedari land of one Nathali to Arvind. It is also submitted by the [2026:RJ-JP:811] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-159/2026] counsel for the petitioner that the complainant has already entered into a compromise with the accused-petitioner and copy of the same has already been submitted before the learned Court below on 20.12.2025 stating therein that no dispute remains between the parties. The certified copy of the compromise has been placed on record as Annexure 3. 5. Learned counsel also submits that son of the original land owner namely Nathali has already filed an affidavit stating therein that his father Nathali has passed away on 28.11.2025 and before his death the land in question has already been sold to one Mohanlal who is the present accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner is said to be in custody since 17.12.2025. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and taking into consideration the allegations made against him and more particularly the fact that a compromise has already been arrived in between the petitioner and the complainant and so also the fact that he is in custody since 17.12.2025, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any [2026:RJ-JP:811] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-159/2026] Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /214