Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14941 (KAR)

SRI. MURALIDHAR DATTATRAY KULKARNI v. SRI. PRABHAKAR GOVIND KULKARNI

RSA/100486/2022 · 2026-02-10

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2023 RSA No. 100486 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100486 OF 2022 (SP) BETWEEN: SRI MURALIDHAR DATTATRAY KULKARNI, AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KHADAKLAT, TQ. CHIKKODI-591201, DIST. BELAGAVI. …APPELLANT (BY SRI B.S.KAMATE, ADVOCATE.) AND: 1. SRI PRABHAKAR GOVIND KULKARNI, AGE: 84 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KHADAKLAT, TQ. CHIKKODI-591201, DIST. BELAGAVI. 2. PUNDALIK BIRA GORADE, AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRI, R/O. KHADAKLAT, TQ. CHIKKODI-591201, DIST. BELAGAVI. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHIVARAJ BALLOLLI, ADVOCATE FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 SERVED.) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.12.2019 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C, NIPANI, IN R.A.NO.42/2018 AND THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.04.2018 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2023 RSA No. 100486 of 2022 NIPPANI, IN O.S.NO.203/2015 AND FURTHER THE SUIT O.S.NO.203/2015 MAY KINDLY BE DECREED AS PRAYED FOR BY ALLOWING THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL WITH COST IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) The appellant is present before the Court. 2. Learned counsel for appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal, which is signed by both the appellant and the learned counsel for appellant. 3. The memo and submission of the learned counsel are placed on record. 4. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. In view of disposal of the appeal, pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of as they do not survive for consideration. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE MRK CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 75