( 2026:HHC:27655 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.384 of 2026 Date of decision: 09.07.2026 M/s Him Tekno Forge Ltd. ….Petitioner Versus Amar Singh & another ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Avneesh Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Harish Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Compliance affidavit has been filed, wherein it has been stated that in compliance to the directions of this Court, the application of the petitioner bearing Application No.IDA/HP/440 in the name of Him Teknoforge Limited, was placed before the 21st Meeting of the Empowered Committee on 06.05.2026. Further it is stated that after examination in light of criteria prescribed under Clause 7.3 of the Scheme, the Committee was of the view that in the absence of any budgetary allocation, the application could not be considered eligible for consideration. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2 ( 2026:HHC:27655 ) 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, it is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy as available under the law. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge July 09, 2026 (reena)