Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14934 (RAJ)

SAMUNDRA SINGH DAROGA SON OF KHAN SINGH DAROGA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/427/2026 · 2026-01-13

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1325] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 427/2026 Samundra Singh Daroga Son Of Khan Singh Daroga, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Village Kishanpura, Post Bisundani, Tehsil Sawer District Ajmer-305407 ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rajasthan State Veterinary Council, Pashudhan Bhawan Campus, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its General Secretary, State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur-302018 3. Rajasthan State Veterinary Council, Through Registrar, Pashu Dhan Bhawan, Lal Kothi Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan -302015 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pranav Pareek with Mr. Aman Lodha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nalin G Narain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner participated in the recruitment process for the post of Livestock Assistant (Pashudhan Sahayak) and after successful document verification, the petitioner's name was duly included in the final selection/merit list dated 09.12.2025 in the applied category. It is submitted that similarly situated candidates, whose names appeared in the said final list, have been issued appointment letters by the respondents, whereas the petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:1325] (2 of 2) [CW-427/2026] has been arbitrarily ignored and not considered for appointment despite being fully eligible and selected. It is submitted that aggrieved by the aforesaid inaction, the petitioner has already submitted a detailed representation dated 26.12.2025 before the Director, Animal Husbandry Department as well as respondent No.2. 2. Heard. 3. Issue notice. 4. On directions of the Court, Mr. Nalin G Narain accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2. 5. In the facts and circumstances, this Court directs Respondent No.2 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed within seven days from the date of passing of this order and the same be decided by 30.01.2026 strictly in accordance with law, as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). 6. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with abovesaid directions. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /15