February 24, 2026 (15) ARDR WPA 27014 of 2025 Julfikar Ali @ Julfikar Ali Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal & ors. Adv. Mokaram Hossain, Adv. Karnab Biswas, …for the petitioner. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioners is taken on record. None appears for the respondents despite service. Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, learned Senior advocate who usually appears for the State and is present in Court today, is requested to represent the State along with his junior Ms. Sangeeta Roy, advocate in this matter. Their appointment be regularised by the appropriate authority. The petitioner is directed to serve copy of the writ petition along with annexure thereto upon Ms. Roy, advocate in course of this day. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private respondents filed a Title Suit against the petitioner claiming title and possession in respect of the property in question. The suit was dismissed by a judgment delivered on 19th September, 2025. Despite the same, the private respondents are continuing to disturb the peaceful possession of the petitioner in respect of the property. The petitioner seeks police assistance. 2 In view of the fact that the suit filed by the private respondents claiming title and possession in respect of the property has been dismissed by the learned trial Court, the petitioner who is in possession of the property and is the recorded owner thereof is entitled to protection. In view of the above, the police authority is directed to render necessary assistance/protection to the petitioner in order to enable him to possess the property in question peacefully without any disturbance whatsoever by the private respondents. The writ petition is disposed of. There shall however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to have been admitted. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)