Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Karnataka · body
2026 DAILYLAW 14927 (KAR)
PRABHAKAR BHAT v. AKBARSAB NADAF
CRL.P/101304/2025 · 2026-02-17
V Srishananda
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14927 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14927 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2417 CRL.P No. 101304 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101304 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN:
PRABHAKAR BHAT AGE. OCC. TAHASILDAR GRADE-2, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583231. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR G., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ANAND R. KOLLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
AKBARSAB NADAF AGE. 46 YEARS, SDC (SUBJECT MANAGEMENT), TAHASILDAR OFFICE, KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583231.
2.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD, THROUGH KOPPAL TOWN P.S. 580008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S. 528 OF BNSS, 2023, SEEKING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS IN FIR AND COMPLAINT REGISTERED IN KOPPAL TOWN P.S. CRIME NO.22/2025 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 8 AND 9 OF THE KARNATAKA STATE PUBLIC RECORDS ACT 2010, ON THE FILE OF PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.
DN) AND JMFC COURT, KOPPAL, VIDE ANNEXURE-G IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 HEREIN CONCERNED AS NULL AND VOID.
CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.18 15:57:26 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2417 CRL.P No. 101304 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Heard Sri Praveen Kumar G., for Sri Anand R.Kolli, learned counsel for petitioner and Smt.Kirtilata R.Patil, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondents.
2. Against the petitioner herein, in respect of the loss of records, Information Commission, Kalaburgi Bench has passed an order on 04.12.2024. Operative portion of the said order reads as under:
“¢ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÉÖÃmï gÉPÁqïìð DPïÖ 2010 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ ¢ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÉÖÃmï ¥À©èPï gÉPÁqïìð gÀƯïì 2005" PÁAiÉÄÝUÀ¼À C£ÀéAiÀÄ PÀæªÀÄ PÉÊUÉÆAqÀÄ ¸ÀA§A¢ü¹zÀ ¥Éưøï oÁuÉAiÀİè zÀÆgÀÄ zÁR°¹ DAiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ J¥sï.L.Dgï. ¥ÀæwAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DAiÉÆÃUÀPÉÌ ¸À°è¸ÀĪÀAvÉ ¥ÀæwªÁ¢AiÀĪÀjUÉ DzÉò¸À¯ÁVzÉ”.
3. Pursuant to the same, a FIR came to be registered in Crime No.22/2025.
4. Very registration of the FIR as referred to above is challenged in this petition.
5. Sri Praveen Kumar G., learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that registration of the FIR is incorrect
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2417 CRL.P No. 101304 of 2025
as the report given vide Annexures-A and C by the Tahsildar and the concerned officials would go to show that such a record was not available when the petitioner has taken charge of the post of Tahsildar Grade-II.
6. If it is so, he may place those materials before the Investigation Officer and appropriate report would be filed.
7. If any adverse report is filed against the petitioner, he may choose to challenge the same in accordance with law.
8. With that liberty, following:
ORDER Petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
CLK CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 50