[2026:RJ-JP:2467] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 572/2026 Sagar Singh Meena Son Of Shri Hansram Meena, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Patoran, Konder, Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Inspector General Of Police, Jodhpur Range Jodhpur (Raj.) 4. Superintendent Of Police, Pali, District Pali (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Ms. Komal Kumari Giri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parth Sharma and Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore, most humble and respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction i. The record of the case may kindly be called for; ii. The respondents may kindly be directed to allow the petitioner to join his duty on the post of constable, because earlier the petitioner was a Constable; however, due to his selection in the Railways, he was relieved from the Police Department on 04.08.2025. Now, the petitioner again wishes to join on the post of Constable. [2026:RJ-JP:2467] (2 of 2) [CW-572/2026] iii. The by order or direction this Hon'ble Court may awarded all the service benefits to the petitioner. iv. The petitioner may be granted for all consequential benefits; V. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which the facts and circumstances of the case warrants be issued and; vi. Cost of the writ petition be allowed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /171