[2026:RJ-JP:14605] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 943/2026 1. Satyaveer S/o Bodan Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Kherki Veerbhan, Police Station Kotputli, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. (Presently In Judicial Custody At District Jail, Kotputli-Behror). 2. Sumer S/o Bodan Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Kherki Veerbhan, Police Station Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. (Presently In Judicial Custody At District Jail, Kotputli-Behror). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumer Singh Ola For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. Mr. Deshraj Sain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 08/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0508/2025 registered at Police Station Kotputali, District Kotputali-Behror for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 324(2), 303(2) of BNS 2023 in FIR and against the order dated 16.12.2025 whereby learned Trial Court dismissed the bail application filed by the accused-petitioner for the offences Sections 189(2), 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 109(1) of BNS 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioners submits that both accused-petitioners party and the complainant party are [2026:RJ-JP:14605] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-943/2026] the members of the same family and the dispute arose on the agricultural fields all of a sudden. He also submits that there was no any criminal intention of the accused-petitioners for causing any such injury which could be dangerous to life. Learned counsel further submits that accused-petitioners are in custody since 05.12.2025 and police after completion of the investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and there are cross cases in between the parties. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor and the counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application and submits that one of the injured Mamta Devi sustained an injury which has been found to be dangerous to life. 4. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and the learned counsel for the complainant. 5. It is not in dispute that the accused party and the complainant party both are members of the same family. The incident has taken place at the agricultural field on demolishing some boundary of the agricultural field. 6. There are cross cases in between the parties. No any such deadly weapon is said to have been used in commissioning of the offence and on perusal of the contents of the First Information Report the allegations are levelled against the several persons and as a general tendency in rural areas the main Karta of the family are being targeted and specifically allegations levelled against them. 7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the [2026:RJ-JP:14605] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-943/2026] incident has taken place at the agricultural field all of a sudden in between members of the same family. Charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and the accused-petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 8. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /32