Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1492 (AP)

M/s. Ammula Constructions, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/4643/2026 · 2026-04-28

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010079292026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 4643/2026 Between: 1. M/S. AMMULA CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR AMMULA SUNIL BABU, S/O. A VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/0.38-22-28-2/2, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, PINCODE. 530009. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE522238. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE. 522238. 3. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, PINCODE. 530003. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEERVA, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAIM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM 2 DISTRICT, PINCODE. 530003. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Ms. Devasri Roshan Kancharla, learned Counsel representing Ms. Modapothula Sumalatha, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Goli G.V.S Sai, learned Counsel, representing Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporation. 2. Sri Goli G.V.S Sai, learned Counsel, representing Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporation, has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Executive Engineer, GVMC. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The claim of the Writ Petitioner is not in dispute. Para 6 of the Written Instructions would indicate that the bill of the Petitioner has been uploaded in the CFMS and is presently awaiting fund clearance 4. Since the amounts are admitted, this Court deems it appropriate to allow this Writ Petition, with a direction to all the Respondents including Respondent Nos.2 & 3, to complete the entire administrative process, both inter-departmental and intra-departmental, by way of mutual cooperation and coordination, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from today and transfer the due amount to the bank account of the Writ Petitioner within four (4) weeks thereafter. 3 5. Writ Petitioner is directed to submit the bank account details to the Competent Authority within four (4) weeks from today for effective compliance. 6. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 29.04.2026 DSV 4 135 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 4643/2026 29.04.2026 DSV 5 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No : WRIT PETITION NO: 4643/2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 02. 29.04.2026 GRKP, J Writ Petition is allowed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV 6