Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14919 (KAR)

PRAVEEN S/O RAMAKANT PHAYADE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/103185/2023 · 2026-02-17

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2397 CRL.P No. 103185 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 103185 OF 2023 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. PRAVEEN S/O RAMAKANT PHAYADE AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED INDIAN ARMY, R/O. KALAMMANAGAR, YELLAPUR-581359. 2. ANUPAMA W/O LATE RAMAKANT PHAYADE AGE. 63 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. KALAMMANAGAR, YELLAPUR-581359. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUBHASH J. BADDI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, YELLAUR POLICE STATION, YELLAPUR REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD-580001. 2. VEENA W/O PRAVEEN PHAYADE AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. NURSE IN K.P.C.L HOSPITAL , KADRA R/O. C/O. ANAND SHET, VILLAGE, DEVALAMAKKI, TQ.AND DIST. KARWAR-581400. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. LINGESH V. KATTEMANE, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CC NO.483/2023 I.E., AS ANNEXURE-A (ARISING OUT YELLAPUR PS OF CRIME NO.75/2023) AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN) AND JMFC, YELLAPURA U/S 498A, 323, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2026.02.18 13:04:11 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2397 CRL.P No. 103185 of 2023 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. After addressing the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo. The memo reads as under: MEMO “In this petition, the Advocate for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are willing to withdraw the petition. Hence, the petition may please be withdrawn. Further, the petitioners request that the Hon’ble Court may grant liberty to file fresh petition. Hence, this memo.” 2. Placing the memo on record, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RHR/- CT:CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 33