Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14919 (DEL)

RAJINDER KUMAR & ANR. v. RAJ KUMARI TANEJA

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/622/2026 · 2026-08-11

Avneesh Jhingan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~69 & 70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010365812026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 622/2026 & I.A. 21525/2026 RAJINDER KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sajal Manchanda, Adv. (through VC). versus RAJ KUMARI TANEJA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gurpreet Singh & Ms. Nitika Sood, Advs. (through VC). (70) # CNR No. DLHC010365822026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 623/2026 & I.A. 21526/2026 RAJINDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sajal Manchanda, Adv. (through VC). versus RAJ KUMARI TANEJA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Gurpreet Singh & Ms. Nitika Sood, Advs. (through VC). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN O R D E R % 11.08.2026 1. These petitions are filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:25:26 Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made. 3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months as prayed for. 4. The petitions are disposed of in the aforesaid terms. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J AUGUST 11, 2026 ‘JK’ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2026 at 11:25:26