Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14917 (RAJ)

HANUMAN S/O SHRI NARAYAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/147/2026 · 2026-01-09

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:803] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 147/2026 1. Hanuman S/o Shri Narayan, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Police Station Tiloniya, Bandar Sindri, District Ajmer. (Presently Confined At Central Jail, Ajmer) 2. Dharmi S/o Shri Narayan, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Police Station Tiloniya, Bandar Sindri, District Ajmer. (Presently Confined At Central Jail, Ajmer) ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Balwada Mr. Sunil Shekhawat Mr. Aditya Raj For Respondent(s) : Ms. Vishalaksi Pareek for Mr. Devanshu Sharma Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 171/2025, registered with the Police Station, Bander Sindri, District Ajmer for offence punishable u/S 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 351(2) of B.N.S. 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 4. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is of giving beating to the complainant party at the agricultural field wherein [2026:RJ-JP:803] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-147/2026] two persons sustained injury. 5. On perusal of the challan papers it has come out that the incident has taken place on 19.11.2025 and the FIR was registered on 20.11.2025. The medico legal report of one of the injured was prepared on 22.11.2025 itself. The medico legal report of Amri was prepared wherein it was found that she had sustained three injuries and all injuries are said to be simple in nature. Another injured namely Ratanlal sustained five injuries out of which four is to be simple in nature and one of the injury was to be grievous in nature. None of the injury is said to be dangerous to life. The accused-petitioner is said to be in custody since 21.12.2025. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned public prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant and also the fact that accused-petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2025 and none of the injury sustained to the complainant party is said to be dangerous to life, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any [2026:RJ-JP:803] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-147/2026] Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /209