CRWP-5445 IN THE (152 ANU RANI STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o the official res petitioners at t representation 2. submitted tha 06.05.2026 be P-5) raising th 5445-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH (152) Da ANI AND ANOTHER Versus
PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Parmender Singh, Advocate f Ms. Bhavna Grewal, Advocate th Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w ial respondents No.2 and 3 to protec rs at the hands of respondent No.4 to tation dated 06.05.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Senior Superintendent o ing their grievances as mentioned in th JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRWP-5445-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
ocate for cate the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing protect the life and liberty of the o.4 to 6 and to take action on their ure P-5). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on dent of Police, Patiala (Annexure ed in the present petition but the AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.08 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5445 same has not He further sub appropriate Superintenden filed by the pe 3. 4. notice on beha be done in due her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro
07.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5445-2026 (O&M) (2) s not yet been considered and no acti er submitted that at this stage, the peti iate directions are issued to tendent of Police, Patiala to decide t the petitioners and take necessary actio Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and s in due course. Let a complete set of th ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 06.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   no action has been taken thereon. he petitioners would be satisfied if to respondent No.2-Senior cide the aforesaid representation ry action thereon. Senior DAG, Punjab has advance e and submits that the needful will et of the paperbook be supplied to r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-5) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.08 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.