IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33255 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2026 Thana- MANPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Mukesh Yadav S/o Awadh Yadav R/o Village - Damarapur Ward No. 11, PS - Manpur, District - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate : Ms. Deepshikha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 14-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with others is said to have assaulted the informant and her husband. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as many as, sixteen persons of the same family have been made an accused and the dispute between parties would be evident from the First Information Report itself that the same was due to construction of a boundary wall between gotiyas. There is no Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33255 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026 2/3 doubt that allegation upon this petitioner is of having assaulted the informant’s husband by means of bhala on his head causing injury to him whereafter other accused persons, namely, Vijay Yadav and Rajesh Yadav also assaulted by means of gadasa causing injury of the face and head. It is submitted that the injury report (Annexure-P/2) indicates one injury on the head and the cheek, but the same may be attributable to the other accused persons also. However, the injuries are said to be simple in nature, mostly caused by hard and blunt substance but for one. There is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner is in custody since 10.03.2026 and good relations have been established between the parties which would be apparent from Annexure-P/3, which is the compromise petition. 5. Learned APP for the State opposed the grant of bail on the basis of allegations made in the First Information Report. 6. Taken into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that the case arises out of a dispute between gotiyas on account of construction of boundary wall, with subsequent establishing of peaceful relations, coupled with the fact that the injuries are also simple in nature, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33255 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026 3/3 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah /concerned Court below in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2026. anand/prachi/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T