[2026:RJ-JP:6874] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 443/2026 1. Mrs. Sangeeta Gupta, Wife Of Dr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Chitrakoot, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Dr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta, Son Of Shri Ganga Charan Gupta, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Chitrakoot, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Secretariate, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Commissioner. 3. Nagar Nigam, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Commissioner. 4. Fire Noc Nodal Officer, Local Self Government Department, Office At G-3, Rajmahal Residential Area, C- Scheme, Ashok Nagar, Near Civil Line Phatak, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 5. Anchor Mall Welfare Society, Through The President, Mr. Suresh Nair, 517, Fifth Floor, Anchor Mall, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 6. Anchor Mall Welfare Society, Through The Secretary, Mr. Shyam Agarwal, 913, Seventh Floor, Anchor Mall, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Mr. Rajesh Sharma S/o Unknown, Owner Of Office At 408, Second Floor, Anchor Mall, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 8. Co-Operative Society, Jaipur, Rajasthan Through Registrar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Gupta [2026:RJ-JP:6874] (2 of 2) [CW-443/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 12/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, has limited his submissions that the writ petition be disposed of by granting him an opportunity to file a representation before respondent No.2 – Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority, for raising his grievances, and in the event of same being made, the decision upon the said representation be made within four weeks thereafter. 2. Considering limited submissions so made, the present writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to make representation before respondent No.2 - Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority, within a period of ten days from today, i.e. 12.02.2026. 3. In the event of any such representation being made, the respondent No.2 may decide the same strictly in accordance with law by passing a speaking and reasoned order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 4. However, in case respondent No.2 arrives at a decision that any further action is required to be taken, the said action shall only be taken after issuing prior notice to the affected parties and granting an opportunity of hearing to them as well. 5. With the abovementioned directions, the present writ petition is disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIPESH CHAYAL /54