Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14908 (RAJ)

SURENDRA KUMAR SON OF LATE SHRI RAMKUMAR CHOUDHARY v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/188/2026 · 2026-01-23

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3197] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 188/2026 Surendra Kumar Son Of Late Shri Ramkumar Choudhary, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Village Mundelakalan, Police Station Zafarpur, District Dwarka, New Delhi, At Present Residing At 181/141, Sector 18, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur, At Present Tenant Flat No. B 04/406, Anupam Apartment, Sector 26, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur, District Jaipur.) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/01/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.857/2025 registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar, District Jaipur City (East) for offence under Section 140(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that no pistol or other incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner nor any connection with the co-accused been established. He also submits that there exist a commercial dealing between the petitioner and the victim and due to non-compliance, [2026:RJ-JP:3197] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-188/2026] this FIR has been lodged on false and concocted grounds. Petitioner is behind the bars since 09.12.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Surendra Kumar Son Of Late Shri Ramkumar Choudhary, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/115