Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14903 (MAD)

NARASIMHAN (Deceased) 1.T.S.Murali and 2 others v. HEMA RAMAN and another

A/1459/2026 · 2026-04-16

A D Maria Clete

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE A No. 1459 of 2026 in TOS.No.17 of 2014 1. NARASIMHAN (Deceased) 1.T.S.Murali No.82, Arya Gowda Road, West Mambalam, Chennai - 600 033 2. T.S.Ananthakrishnan S/o.Late T.S.Narasimhan, No.82, New No.30, Arya Gowda Road, West Mambalam, Chennai - 33. 3. T.S.Nandhini alias M.Rifqa D/o.Late T.S.Narasimhan, No.14/15, S.A.Colony, Kodungaiyuer, Chennai - 118. ..Applicant(s) Vs 1. HEMA RAMAN and another No.22/26, Ground Flr, Adithya Krithi Flats, Nanganallur, Ch - 61 2. Jayanthi Raman No.82, Arya Gowda Road, West Mambalam, Ch - 33 ..Respondent(s) To grant extension of time to execute security bond by the Plaintiff in T.O.S.No.17 of 2014 order dated 07/08/2024. For Applicant(s): M/s.B.Revathy https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis For Respondent(s): Ms.V.Gayathiri DR. A.D.MARIA CLETE, J. dpq ORDER By order dated 07.08.2024 in TOS.No.17 of 2014, the plaintiffs 2, 3 and 4 were granted letters of administration subject to execution of a security bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- in the name of the Assistant Registrar, Original Side II, High Court, Madras. By this application, extension of time is prayed for to execute the security bond. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that she has no objection in granting extension of time. 3. Upon considering the reason set out in the affidavit and being satisfied that sufficient cause is shown, the time for execution of security bond is extended by a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 16.04.2026 dpq A No. 1459 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis in TOS.No.17 of 2014 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis