Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14903 (CHH)

KUNJAL PRASAD RAJWADE v. LALITA GUPTA

MAC/1335/2025 · 2026-01-11

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:1571 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1335 of 2025 1 - Kunjal Prasad Rajwade S/o Shri Roopsai Rajwade Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Patrapara, P.S. And Tahsil Udaypur, District - Surguja (C.G.) 2 - Virendra Kumar Rajwade S/o Late Devnarayan Rajwade Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Patrapara P.S. And Tahsil Udayapur District - Surguja (C.G.) (Driver ) ... Appellants versus 1 - Lalita Gupta Wd/ Late Ashok Kumar Gupta Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Khamhariya P.S. And Tahsil Udayapur District - Surguja (C.G.) (Claimants) 2 - Preeti Gupta D/o Late Ashok Kumar Gupta Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Khamhariya P.S. And Tahsil Udayapur District - Surguja (C.G.) 3 - Palak Gupta D/o Late Ashok Kumar Gupta Aged About 20 Years R/o Village Khamhariya P.S. And Tahsil Udayapur District - Surguja (C.G.) 4 - Prince Gupta S/o Late Ashok Kumar Gupta Aged About 17 Years (Minor Through Guardian Mother Res.No. 1 Lalita Gupta R/o Village Khamhariya P.S. And Tahsil Udayapur District - Surguja (C.G.) 5 - Ramnarayan S/o Late Ramdhani Aged About 73 Years R/o Village Khamhariya P.S. And Tahsil Udayapur District - Surguja (C.G.) 6 - Mukund Rajwade S/o Ramjag Rajwade Aged About 58 Years R/o Village Labji P.S. Manipur District - Surguja (C.G.) Ex Vehicle Owner ) ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE 2 For Appellants : Mr. Vikas Ghritlahre, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate For Respondent(s) : None though served. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment on Board 12/01/2026 1. Mr. Ghritlahre, learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that during the pendency of the present appeal, the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court. In view of the said settlement, the appellants do not wish to pursue the appeal. 2. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the appellants, the appeal is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- Rakesh Mohan Pandey JUDGE Nadim