M/S. CHANDRAKALA UDYOG v. EMPLOYEES P.F. ORG. & ORS
WPA/9414/2016 · 2026-03-17
Shampa Dutt Paul
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14903 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 14903 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
17.03.2026
Item No.12 Ct. No. 30 Aloke WPA 9414 of 2016
M/s. Chandrakala Udyog Vs Employees Provident Fund Organization & Ors.
Mr. K.B.S. Mahapatra
Mr. Aditya Shit … for the petitioner
Mr. Soumya Mazumder, ld. Sr. Adv. Mr. Bandhu Brata Bhula … for the respondent no. 3 Ms. Aparna Banerjee … for the respondent/PF Authority
1. Learned counsel who initially appeared for the petitioner has appeared and submits that the petitioner herein is not responding to his messages. As such, he has no instruction in this matter.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents are present.
3. Considering the conduct of the writ petitioner, the writ application stands dismissed for default.
4. Connected application, if any, stands disposed of.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)