[2026:RJ-JP:813] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 164/2026 Rajveer Son Of Raghuveer, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Karoth, Police Statin Chiksana, District Bharatpur (Raj.). (At Present Accused Confined In District Jail, Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 223/2025, registered with the Police Station, Chiksana, District Bharatpur for offence punishable u/S 8, 20 of N.D.P.S. Act, 1985. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 4. The allegation against the accused-petitioner submits accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely being husband of the co-accused Smt. Bhagwati from whose possession the contraband 4 kg Ganja is said to have been recovered. He further submits that Smt. Bhagwati as accused has enlarged on bail by the subordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 13.08.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9789/2025. He also submits that the contraband recovered [2026:RJ-JP:813] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-164/2026] from the possession of Smt. Bhagwati is also less then commercial quantity. 5. It is also submitted that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 20.11.2025 and there is no more any kind of interrogation or recovery pending against the petitioner. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 7. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and more particularly the fact that no contraband is said to have been recovered from the present accused-petitioner and co-accused from whose possession the contraband was recovered that too less than commercial quantity, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /216