1 / 3 2026:CGHC:1616 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 235 of 2026 Kumar Sai Chauhan S/o Late Kedarnath Chauhan Aged About 54 Years Occupation- Service, Posted As Secretary, Gram Panchayat Mahant, Janpad Panchayat- Nawagarh, Tahsil Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa C.G. R/o Ward No. 14, Setthi Nagar, Shivrinarayan, District Janjgir-Champa C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur C.G. 2 - The Director, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur C.G. 3 - The Collector, District Janjgir-Champa C.G. 4 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa C.G. 5 - The Deputy Director (Panchayat), Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa C.G. 6 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat- Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa C.G. Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.01.14 10:46:27 +0530 2 / 3 7 - The Gram Panchayat Mahant, Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Mahant, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa C.G. 8 - The Gram Panchayat Kamta, Through Its Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Kamta, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa C.G. 9 - Rameshwar Patel, Secretary, Gram Panchayat Bhadesar, (Additional Incharge Of Gram Panchayat Kuthur And Mahant), Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For State : Ms. Deeksha Gauraha, Dy. Govt. Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 12/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the State raises an objection that according to pleading made in the writ petition, petitioner has filed WPS No.13656 of 2025 which was withdrawn on 05.12.2025 with liberty to file representation before the authority and, therefore, no relief as prayed for can be granted in this writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has submitted representation on 08.12.2025 which is still pending consideration and therefore a direction be issued to respondents to decide the representation submitted by petitioner in terms of order dated 05.12.2025 passed in WPS No.13656 of 2025 . 3. Considered the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties. 3 / 3 4. Considering the relief sought for by the petitioner in para-10.2 of writ petition, it is disposed of with a direction to respondent to take decision on the representation of petitioner within an outer limit of six weeks from the date of receipt of order, if not already decided. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen