[2026:RJ-JP:799] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 131/2026 Devendra S/o Kedar Singh, R/o Mangal Vihar Colony Police Station Kotwali District Dholpur (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Jain Mr. Udit Sapra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 09/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 342/2025, registered with the Police Station, Sadar Dholpur, District Dholpur for offence punishable u/S 189(2), 112(2), 281, 132, 109(1) of B.N.S. 2023 and u/S 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and u/S 29, 51 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and u/S 41, 42 of Rajasthan Forest Act, 1953 and u/S 3(1), 25(1B), 5(1)(A), 25(1)(a) of The Arms Act, 1959 (Amendment 2019). 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been implicated in the case based on the false and fabricated facts. He further submits that the co-accused namely Sachin and Sunil Kumar have already been enlarged on bail by the subordinate Bench of this Court. [2026:RJ-JP:799] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-131/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner further submits that as per the contents of the F.I.R. the present case of the accused-petitioner is in no manner distinguishable from the case of the co-accused persons who have already been enlarged on bail. It is also submitted that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 08.12.2025. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application and submits that the allegation levelled against the accused-petitioner is grievous in nature. 4. Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and so also so as to maintain the parity, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /202