Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 14897 (HP)

SAKHI MOHAMMAD v. H.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.

CWP/11099/2026 · 2026-07-07

Bipin Chander Negi, Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.11099 of 2026 Decided on : 07.07.2026 Sakhi Mohammad ...Petitioner Versus HP State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. and Ors. …Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Amit Dhumal, Advocate. For the respondent(s) : Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral) By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner prays for continuation of contract period for three years or till finalization of the next tender. Petitioner further prays for uniform implementation of policy/recommendations, prescribing a contract period of three years throughout the State. 2. Though the petitioner and respondents have apparently entered into an agreement and accepted the period, for a period of two years and the said fact is evident from the agreement dated 27.04.2024 (Annexure P-2). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the information received under the Right to 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes -2- Information Act, 2005, for certain tenders in Districts like Nahan and Solan, the contract period for similar agreements is three years. It is, thus, submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is discrimination against the petitioner. 3. Perusal of the paper book would go on to show that the petitioner has already sent a legal notice dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure P-5) to the respondents, claiming extension of the period of tender. 4. Keeping in view the above, we are of the considered opinion that the issue in the case at hand is still under consideration and the respondents-Corporation is directed to take a call on the said legal notice dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure P-5), and pass a speaking order, keeping in view the issue raised in the writ petition also. The decision be taken within a period of four weeks’ from today. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Bipin Chander Negi) Judge 07th July, 2026 (Gaurav Rawat)